Back to Docket

Plaintiffs' Notice of Pre-Hearing Safety and Case-Management Matters, Request for Temporary Restraining Order and Court-Ordered Forensic Audit of Altman-Controlled Entities, and Proposed Roster Reorganization for May 28, 2026 Hearing

McNeil & Poyer v. SAC 181, LLC et al. — 2025-CP-10-05095

Document Overview

SC 9th Circuit Common Pleas Case number: 2025-CP-10-05095
Filing Date: May 11, 2026
Document: Plaintiffs' Notice of Pre-Hearing Safety and Case-Management Matters, Request for Temporary Restraining Order and Court-Ordered Forensic Audit of Altman-Controlled Entities, and Proposed Roster Reorganization for May 28, 2026 Hearing
Document Type: Plaintiffs’ pre-hearing notice and case-management request seeking ADA access relief, leave to amend, Rule 36 narrowing, a temporary restraining order and forensic audit, hearing-roster reorganization, continuity of judicial assignment, and referrals to investigative authorities before the May 28, 2026 hearing.
Includes: Requests immediate accommodations and pre-hearing rulings on pending motions; proposes an asset-preservation TRO covering Altman-controlled entities and a forensic audit; recommends a streamlined hearing sequence for the May 28 roster; seeks Judge Wheeler’s continued assignment through trial; and includes seven exhibits addressing Plaintiffs’ pro se posture, whistleblower systems analysis, roster recommendations, mortgage payoff evidence, pro se filing barriers, recusal materials, and a Supreme Court mandamus-status supplement.

Read it now

NameDescriptionTypeFiledDocket Seq.Documents
James C. McNeil Pltffs Notice/Pre Hearing Safety,Request f/TRO & Court Order Notice 05/11/2026 P1A51 Official copy
Restored copy

Color image encodingRestoredfiled

Executive Summary

Plaintiffs James C. “Chris” McNeil and Meaghan Poyer filed this pre-hearing notice and request in their Charleston County Common Pleas action against SAC 181, Meridian Residential Group, the Bayles defendants, and MRG Investing. They assert that delays, unequal treatment of pro se litigants, unresolved ADA requests, and alleged obstruction have impaired their access to the court and created safety and asset-preservation risks before the May 28, 2026 hearing. They ask the court to grant ADA accommodations, allow their Second Amended Complaint, enter Rule 36 admissions where appropriate, issue a TRO restricting transfers by allegedly Altman-controlled entities, and order a forensic audit. They also seek to reorganize the May 28 motion roster, keep Judge Will Wheeler assigned through trial, and refer alleged fraud, obstruction, harassment, and attorney-disciplinary issues to state and federal investigative agencies.

Legal Significance

Plaintiffs seek extensive pre-hearing intervention before the May 28, 2026 hearing, including ADA accommodations, leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, Rule 36 deemed admissions, and reorganization of the motion roster. The filing puts at issue alleged unequal treatment of pro se litigants, procedural delay, judicial impartiality, and the requested continuation of Judge Wheeler’s assignment while the South Carolina Supreme Court reviews related mandamus issues. It also seeks an immediate TRO, asset-preservation measures, expedited forensic discovery, and a court-ordered forensic audit covering Altman-controlled entities based on asserted risk of asset transfers that could impair judgment collection. Finally, it asks the court to refer alleged forgery, fraud, obstruction, harassment, and professional-conduct issues to state and federal investigative, regulatory, and disciplinary authorities; none of these allegations or requested remedies is established unless the court grants relief.

Document Access

Restored copy: native text with the clerk FILE stamp


It appears you don't have a PDF plugin for this browser.


Unable to view the pdf on your mobile device?

Download the PDF


Full text of the filing (4 sections, server-rendered)

Exhibit E (p. 1-1)

EXHIBIT E
Structural Obstruction to Justice for Self-Represented Parties in Charleston SC Court of Common Pleas

Systemic Friction to Justice (p. 2-2)

Systemic Friction to Justice for Self-Represented Parties in Charleston, SC Court of Common Pleas

Pro Se and counsel filing comparison (p. 3-3)

Pro Se scanned in, streaks, no identifying e-filing blue text Counsel filing is digitally e-filed, crisp, with identifying blue text on right

Loss of resolution in scanned graphics (p. 3-3)

Scan of Pro Se hand-filed graphics from exhibit rendered Black and White, losing resolution

Original to demonstrate detail and color lost.

Machine-readable record

Verification hashes (SHA-256)
Official copy
47c8f325a9026164b7fe73fee45bcfb45495226f78d4c32d193411eb8ba63290
Native source
20494143b806214551cf05f3c66e82535f6d1b9fc0ee97168e4ddbccac5b82d5
Restored copy
669309caa0498d37ac7cc784045090cc2a880db89832073c7c62f90578870028
Normalized text
pending

Parties in this Record

  • James C. McNeil (Filed by)
  • Judge Wheeler (Judge)