Back to Docket

Plaintiffs' Supplemental Motion for ADA Accommodation (Remote Filing and Appearances)

McNeil & Poyer v. SAC 181, LLC et al. — 2025-CP-10-05095

Document Overview

SC 9th Circuit Common Pleas Case number: 2025-CP-10-05095
Filing Date: January 30, 2026
Document: Plaintiffs' Supplemental Motion for ADA Accommodation (Remote Filing and Appearances)
Document Type: Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Motion for ADA Accommodation seeking remote filing and appearance accommodations based on PTSD-related functional limitations.
Includes: Requests electronic-filing access or, alternatively, email filing deemed filed upon receipt; requests Zoom or comparable remote appearances for non-evidentiary hearings. Includes five exhibits: email correspondence concerning service stipulations and alleged threats, counsel’s communications with court staff, and Meaghan Poyer’s sworn affidavit describing litigation-related impacts on the plaintiffs’ household and wellbeing.

Read it now

Filing preview with Scannergate scanner illustration
NameDescriptionTypeFiledDocket Seq.Documents
Meaghan Poyer Supplemental Motion/ADA Accommodations Motion 01/30/2026 P1A39 Official copy
Restored copy

1-bit bitonal image encodingRestoredruled on

Executive Summary

Plaintiffs James C. McNeil and Meaghan Poyer, proceeding pro se, filed this supplemental motion seeking ADA accommodations under Title II based on McNeil’s asserted severe PTSD-related limitations, including impaired sleep, concentration, safe driving, and ability to meet in-person court requirements.

They request access to electronic filing for the joint plaintiffs, or alternatively that emailed PDF filings be deemed filed upon receipt and docketed by the clerk. They also seek authorization to attend non-evidentiary status conferences and motion hearings remotely by Zoom or similar platform with 24 hours’ notice. The motion asserts that mandatory physical filing imposes unequal barriers on disabled pro se litigants and that defendants’ alleged mischaracterization of McNeil’s conduct has exacerbated his condition.

Legal Significance

Plaintiffs seek Title II ADA accommodations to overcome alleged PTSD-related barriers to physically filing documents and appearing in court. The motion asks the court to authorize pro se electronic filing, or alternatively deem emailed PDFs filed upon clerk receipt and require prompt docketing confirmation, while permitting remote attendance at non-evidentiary hearings on 24 hours’ notice.

It places at issue whether McNeil’s asserted severe PTSD and inability to safely drive or manage in-person obligations require modifications to the court’s standard procedures, and whether those modifications may extend to filings jointly made with Poyer. The filing preserves Plaintiffs’ ability to seek relief from filing and appearance requirements without changing substantive deadlines, scheduled depositions, or the merits of pending motions.

Document Access

Restored copy: native text with the clerk FILE stamp


It appears you don't have a PDF plugin for this browser.


Unable to view the pdf on your mobile device?

Download the PDF


Machine-readable record

Verification hashes (SHA-256)
Official copy
d05bf579387f920abe909d54970e428c978592ac463abdc05fe4db0ad8b2e5af
Native source
0392379de8f67760e822ee18910cd2151521f985ee1fd8a4f7e46bbe51b25d74
Restored copy
1c410860be4b9db8f761814f64c2b193caec7486e0b017f4614ffc75fb9881f6
Normalized text
pending

Why this restored record exists

The official docket copy of this filing was stored by the clerk's scanner as 1-bit bitonal image encoding. Search engines, assistive technology and AI systems read that shelf. This page carries the filing as the author submitted it, the clerk's FILE stamp as an independent overlay, and the cryptographic tether that lets any reader confirm the two files are the same filing.

Parties in this Record

  • Meaghan Poyer (Filed by)
  • Charleston County Court of Common Pleas (Court)
  • Judge Wheeler (Judge)